Who is using CAM?
The barriers to integrative medicine are beginning to fall --
or, at least are becoming less difficult to overcome.
Alternative healing practices are increasingly being tested for
effectiveness and safety in well-designed research studies. The
intermixing of diverse cultures in the West are bringing once
distant healing practices to the forefront and more Americans
are turning to integrative medical care than ever before.
The movement toward integrative medicine in the United States
has been prompted by a growing consumer demand for CAM services.
A landmark study published in 1993 found that more than
one-third of Americans had sought CAM therapies, that in 1990
they had made more visits to CAM providers than to their primary
care physicians, and that consumers had spent more than 13
billion dollars out-of-pocket for these CAM visits.
Studies suggest that demand for CAM services continues to
grow at a startling rate. A 2001 survey found that nearly 70% of
Americans have used at least one form of CAM therapy in their
lifetime, making this "unconventional" medical
approach one of the fastest growing sectors of American
healthcare. Although herbs and supplements are not regulated by
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), pharmacies across
the country are experiencing a tremendous surge in the demand
for these alternative remedies. From 1991 to 1996 alone, the
demand for over-the-counter natural remedies (including herbs
and supplements) doubled. In a 1996 survey by Landmark
Healthcare, more than 70% of HMOs reported an increase in
requests for CAM by their members. Most patients (56%) requested
acupuncture, followed by chiropractic (45%), massage (25%),
acupressure and biofeedback (21% each), hypnotherapy (8%), and
reflexology (4%).
Studies also suggest that U.S. medical schools may be warming
up to CAM. As of 1998, 75 out of 117 (64%) U.S. medical schools
offer at least one course in CAM. In a 1994 survey, 60 percent
of doctors reported recommending CAM to their patients. Nearly
half of the doctors who responded to the survey acknowledged
that they used CAM themselves. More and more health insurance
plans are also covering CAM, particularly treatments such as
acupuncture and chiropractic, whose safety and effectiveness in
the treatment of certain health problems has been fairly well
researched. A number of health plans now cover the Ornish heart
program, which has a basis in yoga and nutrition. All of these
changes in American healthcare point to the careful
movement—often with a healthy dose of skepticism—toward an
integrative medicine system that incorporates the most useful
therapies from the world's many healing traditions.
What are the major types of CAM?
The National Center for Complementary and Alternative
Medicine (NCCAM) classifies CAM therapies into five major
groups:
What types of changes in policy are happening in order to
incorporate CAM into the U.S. medical system?
In 1991, under a Congressional mandate, the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) established the Office of Alternative
Medicine (OAM) with an annual budget of 2 million dollars to
coordinate NIH research on nontraditional health practices.
Specifically, OAM was to evaluate CAM practices, support CAM
research and training, and establish a CAM information
clearinghouse for the general public.
In 1998 Congress established the National Center for
Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) to supersede the
OAM. With an annual budget of more than 68 million dollars,
NCCAM's mission is to support basic and applied CAM research and
provide information to healthcare providers as well as the
public. Among other efforts, NCCAM focuses on research that
evaluates the safety and effectiveness of herbs and nutritional
supplements and their potential for interaction with
medications. It also evaluates other CAM treatments such as
acupuncture and chiropractic. NCCAM funds several research
centers outside of the NIH (to learn more about the centers and
their research agendas, visit NCCAM's web site at http://nccam.nih.gov/research/).
In July of 2000, the White House announced the establishment
of a White House Commission on Alternative Medicine, designating
the Chair and the first 10 members. The goal of the commission
is to develop a set of legislative and administrative
recommendations to maximize the benefits of CAM for the American
public. Going beyond the research goals of NCCAM, the commission
will set the agenda for the education and training of CAM
practitioners as well as provide policy recommendations for the
insurance industry coverage of alternative therapies.
What is the Future of CAM?
There are many encouraging signs that CAM is slowly becoming
accepted into mainstream medicine. For example, breakthroughs in
CAM research are frequently published in prestigious Western
peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of the American
Medical Association and the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Still, there are real obstacles to the achievement of truly
integrated medicine. Some of these obstacles include cultural
conflicts, lack of scientific studies, and administrative
issues. However, because conventional doctors and CAM
practitioners alike seek to create safe, effective, and
affordable medical treatment for all patients, the integration
of the best CAM into conventional medicine may not be worlds
away.
Resources
The following web sites are all available free of charge,
without subscription.
Government sites:
FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition: Dietary
Supplements
http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/supplmnt.html
National Cancer Institute: Office of Cancer Complementary and
Alternative Medicine (OCCAM)
http://occam.nci.nih.gov/
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
http://nccam.nih.gov/
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS)
http://odp.od.nih.gov/ods/
Directories:
University of Wisconsin HealthWeb—Alternative /
Complementary Medicine
www.medsch.wisc.edu/chslib/hw/altmed/
NOAH (New York Online Access to Health): Alternative Medicine
Resources
http://www.noah-health.org/english/alternative/alternative.html
Rosenthal Center: Information Resources
http://cpmcnet.columbia.edu/dept/rosenthal/CAM.html
University of Pittsburgh: Alternative Medicine Homepage
www.pitt.edu/%7Ecbw/altm.html
References
Astin JA, Marie A, Pelletier KR, Hansen E, Haskell WL. A
review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative
medicine by mainstream physicians. Arch Intern Med.
1998;158(21):2303-2310.
Berman BM, Singh BB, Harnoll SM, Singh BK, Reilly D. Primary
care physicians and complementary-alternative medicine:
training, attitudes, and practice patterns. J Am Board Fam
Pract. 1998;11:272-281.
Blumenthal M. Introduction. In: Blumenthal M, Busse WR,
Goldberg A, eds. The Complete German Commission E Monographs:
Therapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines. Boston, Mass:
Integrative Medicine Communications; 1998:5-70.
Davant C III. What you should tell patients about alternative
medicine. In: Micozzi MS, Bacchus AN, eds. The Physician's
Guide to Alternative Medicine. Atlanta, Ga: American Health
Consultants; 1999:363-366.
Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, et al. Unconventional
medicine in the United States. N Engl J Med.
1993;328(4):246-252.
Jonas WB. One kind of medicine or many? The view from the NIH.
In: Micozzi MS, Bacchus AN, eds. The Physician's Guide to
Alternative Medicine. Atlanta, Ga: American Health
Consultants; 1999:367-369.
Kessler RC, Davis RB, Foster DF, et al. Long-term trends in
the use of complementary and alternative medical therapies in
the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:262-268.
Micozzi MS. Characteristics of Complementary and Alternative
Medicine. In: Micozzi MS, ed. Fundamentals of Complementary
and Alternative Medicine. New York, NY: Churchill
Livingstone; 1996:3-8.
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
About NCCAM: General Information. Accessed on August 8, 2002 at http://nccam.nih.gov/htdig/search.html.
Novey DW. Basic principles of complementary/alternative
therapies; The dilemma of evidence; Leaving the medical model;
and Integration. In: Clinician's Complete Reference to
Complementary/Alternative Medicine. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby;
2000:5-7, 7-9, 10-12, 13-16.
Pelletier KR. The Best Alternative Medicine. New York,
NY: Simon & Schuster; 2000.
Pelletier KR, Astin JA. Integration and reimbursement of
complementary and alternative medicine by managed care and
insurance providers: 2000 update and cohort analysis. Altern
Ther Health Med. 2002;8(1):38-39, 42, 44.
Pelletier KR, Astin JA, Haskell WL. Current trends in the
integration and reimbursement of complementary and alternative
medicine by managed care organizations (MCOs) and insurance
providers: 1998 update and cohort analysis. Am J Health
Promot. 1999;14(20:125-133.
The White House: Office of the Press Secretary—Statement by
the President [press release]. M2 Presswire; July 14, 2000.
Thomas KJ, Nicholl JP, Coleman P. Use and expenditure on
complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Comp
Ther Med. 2001;9:2-11.
Woodham A, Peters D. Encyclopedia of Healing Therapies.
New York, NY: DK Publishing; 1997.